Thursday, August 28, 2008

It's the Economy, Stu..um.. Darlin'!


I recently got this post on my facebook page. It was in response to my off-the-cuff blurb" The Doobie thinks the only change Obama wants is the stuff in my pockets. Then he'll go after the folding money. "


"Wow, then congratulations are in order. That means your household makes over $250k a year! Go you guys! See, because everyone under that amount will have MORE money in their pockets. Power to the middle class! Finally!"


Now the person who wrote this is a lovely person. Very kind, giving, thoughtful. An all around great person.


Unfortunately, even awesome people can be convinced that ubiquitous "change" is the answer. (i.e. They can be wrong).
.
You see, I don't make that much. it would be reeeaaaly nice if I did. But, as I replied on Facebook: "As a small business owner, my business earns a good deal more than I pay myself (due to operating expenses, overhead, etc). My tax filing is a Sole Proprietor. S corps , etc have far more restrictions. There are just too many benefits that fit my situation. So,that is the most economically feasible classification at this time. but, EVERYTHING my business earns is seen as PERSONAL Income. Mr Obama & his cronies don't see that distinction or don't care. To them...I'm "RICH". They will increase my tax liability to that of 37.9% up to 50%" (these are not arbitrary numbers. the info came from many places but is crystallized here: http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=0E92FEE0-3048-5C12-0002330C2A831238. )


"By all means, let's penalize success. Let's say sure...achieve the American Dream but then, we'll punish you for it. I learned a long time ago the flashiest, prettiest car isn't necessarily the best car. I could always close up my business. That'd show em. No Obama is not only the wrong choice but an expensive one. But thanks for asking."


But what if I did make that much? If so, it would be through hard work, toil, investment in time & money, etc. It's not because I got a visit from the Cash Fairy. Liberals see success as something actionable. "How Dare you succeed! others are suffering" I care about my fellow man & make charitable contributions like a responsible citizen...but where does it say I'm required to make everyone's life wonderful? There was a society that preached Universal Healthcare, Caps on income. Where capitalism was discarded and where all income was funneled back to the government for the "common good". It was created in 1922 under a gentleman named Vladmir Lenin. A police state. A socialist society where workers had no rights. I'm not ready for such a society to become the letter of the law here. i never will be. No. I have to line up on the side of more personal responsibility. More financial responsibility. Hard work leads to great reward. I know my needs better than outsiders or politicians. Why would I leave my welfare up to strangers? And Sharing the "wealth"? The more successful I become...jobs are created. the more I make...the more I contribute to organizations like Special Olympics, American Cancer Society, etc. That's how you grow an economy. That's how you help others.


There are many issues I have with McCain. He was not my first choice. But further down the list, after Brittany Spears and Daffy Duck is Barry Obama. The guy is so eager to please that he'll say whatever is expedient to get elected. Sure...politicians do that. But the guy has ZERO experience in ANYTHING. He has 145 days in the US Senate. Would you hire a lawyer or doctor with that amount of experience? I'm sure they'd do their best but there are things that experience gives you that eagerness and lofty wishes does not. Charisma does not solve problems.


Universal healthcare? It's a program that is breaking both Canada & the UK. It allows for a shoddy, over-crowded, under-funded system. People will suffer far more that under the current program. Plus, where does the money come from? The magic $250 grand club can only pay so much. Such a grand plan is guaranteed to raise ALL taxes. No matter where they come from...a physician's time is not free. And if it becomes so...what corners would have to be cut to make them comply to the system? Questions.


Energy? I'm all for Boone Pickens plan. Problem is...what do you do on no/low wind days? Easy...use existing energy (battery backup, etc) to power it. Yep. The wind...she don't blow everyday. What about the millions of oil using cars currently on the road? What happens to those? Is the government going to retrofit them all to burn cleaner energy? What's the cost? Where does this money come from? Most likely, raising taxes but i can see the govt. offering tax breaks for those that comply. What about the lower middle class & the poor? How do they get their clean energy cars? Again...the money has to come from somewhere. Questions.
.
The reason that there is a US (and by extension international) energy crunch is that a Democratic Congress halted a large percentage of US exploration & farmed it out overseas. owls were saved but costs were incurred. You have raw crude purchasing and import costs. Then there's taxes on the gas. States get roughly .28 per Gallon. The US Govt gets about .18 per gallon. The oil companies? Yes...there are production costs to make raw crude user friendly but the Oil companies do purchase, refine & distribute the fuel. That aint cheap. Don't they deserve something for their efforts? Should they just give it away? I'm more concerned with the taxation. What exactly does the govt do in this transaction? Oh yeah...they LET us buy it. If drilling can be resumed here...the supply will drive the cost down and allow funding for exploration of hydrogen, nuclear and other alternatives.
.
A "Windfall Profit" tax like Obama proposes will drive costs even higher, cost jobs and limit our ability to explore other options. And who determines what is "too much" money for the Oil Companies to make? What happens if Pickens plan becomes successful? You don't think the Govt will tax wind? They'll find a way. Further more, not re-establishing our own oil drilling program means money can continue to fund terrorist supporting countries overseas. Money that helped make 9-11 happen. How is drilling not a winning proposition? Supply & demand. Increased supplies forces pricing down. Pres. Bush announces an Executive lifting of the drilling ban & the price magically dropped. Coincidence? OPEC makes the rules now. We can change the game easily. So why not drill? Questions.
.
I support all energy exploration. Everything. But right now...we need oil to run things. That part CAN'T be changed easily. Questions.
.
There are many other reasons...and there are MANY. Simply put: Obama's platform is flawed. It penalizes success while championing mediocrity. What he explains makes no fiscal or financial sense. But far more troubling is what he can't explain. Change. Change what? Change how? Change when? How Much? For who? His answers cause more questions and, in hard economic times, consumers don't need to pay more. And it wont just be the "Rich".
.
It's popular to bash the President. He's not perfect. But the problems we face are not solely on his shoulders. the Democratic Congress controls a lot of these issues (see the no vote on drilling for proof). But it's easier to focus on just one target. Then explain to me why congress has a lower approval rating than he? People do know the truth. You just have to coax it out of them.
.
A little known fact is that I have strong political beliefs. I don't share them often because Conservatives are demonized but the press as war-mongering, rich folk who hate the poor & are racists. Nothing is further from the truth. I was liberal when I was younger. But, now that I've worked hard, made a life & have begun to create a future for my family...I see how easily someone can take it away with the stroke of a pen. All to make the world "better". And done, Without my having any say so in the matter. But in this election, we all have a says so. Don't buy into "Change" as an all encompassing placebo. THINK about what to change, how that gets done & what are the consequences. often, It's not as simple as the politicians make it seem. No I'm not rich. I'm middle class. And I'd like it to stay that way. But I do aspire to greater things eventually. And for me to have that opportunity, Obama's "Change" will take more than I can give.
.
And as for my kind friend who started me on this diatribe? She's still an awesome person. One of the best. A valued friend. She has every right to her opinion. But so do I. :)
.
And with that...my soapbox is holstered. For now.

3 comments:

EegahInc said...

I never pegged myself as a conservative kind of guy growing up, but it's amazing what being self-employed can do to a person :)

Look, I'm proud as hell that we've finally reached the point where race and gender don't immediately disqualify someone from being president, and my recent foray into religious fanaticism has made me sympathetic to certain social programs, but come on, this guy is just wrong on so many levels.

Oh wait, gotta go, Michael McDonald's trying to be Ray Charles at the DNC. Should be fun.

Mr. Doob said...

I used to be all about "stickin' it to the MAN." The problem is...I grew up & became the MAN. When you are soley responsible for whether a business succeeds or fails...it can be sobering. Liberalism is the belief of care-free youth. Self reliance compels you to grow up. Some people just choose to ignore it.

David said...

But, hey, he really does have a cool poster. I mean, has there been a cooler poster of an actual person in the past, I dunno, 30 years? I want a poster of me that looks like that.

I know I'm replying to an old post, but I watched Obama on 60 minutes the other night, and he's an incredibly intelligent dude, who I think, will have to moderate to the center. I'm sure there are some things in store that will be just plain wrong for my conservative mentality, but I think I'm gonna give him a chance (what choice do I have?). And I think I'm gonna swear off talk radio, which I've been addicted to for a few years. I think it's just made me a bit too cranky, too skeptical, too cynical.

I think he may bring about some change we don't need, but perhaps he will bring about some change we do need. Or let's hope so, anyway.
Trying to be optimistic here!